Chr. Michelsen Institute >
CMI Collection (Reports, Working Papers, Articles etc.) >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10202/25

Title: The Resource Curse: Which Institutions Matter?
Authors: Kolstad, Ivar
Keywords: Natural resources
Resource curse
Issue Date: 2007
Publisher: Chr. Michelsen Institute
Series/Report no.: CMI Working Paper
WP 2007: 2
Abstract: Two types of models are dominant in the current resource curse literature. One type of model studies the selection of entrepreneurs into rent-seeking versus productive activities. The other type analyzes the use of patronage by politicians seeking re-election. The policy implications of the two models are quite different. The first model suggests that institutions governing the private sector ought to be improved. The second that institutions governing the public sector should be emphasized. This paper empirically tests the impact of the private versus public sector institutions on the resource curse, using cross-country data from Sachs and Warner (1997a) and Polity IV. The main result is that only improved private sector institutions ameliorate the resource curse.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10202/25
ISBN: 978-82-8062-172-6
ISSN: 0804-3639
Appears in Collections:CMI Collection (Reports, Working Papers, Articles etc.)

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Working paper WP 2007-2.pdf216KbAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


Feedback Chr. Michelsens Institutt
Fantoftveien 38, 5072 Bergen
E-post: bora@cmi.no