Chr. Michelsen Institute >
CMI Collection (Reports, Working Papers, Articles etc.) >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10202/145

Title: Poverty reduction strategy processes in Malawi and Zambia
Authors: Bwalya, Edgar
Rakner, Lise
Svåsand, Lars
Tostensen, Arne
Tsoka, Maxton
Keywords: Poverty reduction
Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSP)
World Bank
Issue Date: 2004
Publisher: Chr. Michelsen Institute
Series/Report no.: CMI Report
R 2004: 8
Abstract: Malawi and Zambia are poor and heavily indebted countries whose dependence on foreign aid is pronounced. They both qualify for debt relief in terms of the Heavily Indebted Poor Country (HIPC) initiative under the auspices of the Bretton Woods institutions, provided they formulate a Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP) that satisfies the new ‘process’ conditionality which emphasises broad participation. In grappling with the PRSP process the stakeholders (the state, non-state actors, and donors) appear to have produced credible policy documents with a measure of ‘national ownership’. On a comparative note, it is significant that civil society organisations played an active role in both Malawi and Zambia in formulating the PRSP and thus lent the outcome some legitimacy. It is also significant that in both countries the national assemblies were marginalised in these policy-making exercises, which were driven by the respective executive branches of government, notably the Ministries of Finance. In the case of Malawi the modest involvement by parliament was attributable mainly to its general subordination to the executive in a presidential system of government, while the coincidence of the PRSP process and the 2001 elections was the main explanatory factor in Zambia. The donors found themselves in an ambivalent position. On the one hand, in the interest of creating national ownership of the PRSP they were expected to keep their hands off. On the other hand, they were apprehensive that the substantive nature of the final document would not satisfy the World Bank and IMF eligibility criteria for debt relief. Hence, they took active part in the process.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10202/145
ISBN: 82-8062-085-0
ISSN: 0805-505X
Appears in Collections:CMI Collection (Reports, Working Papers, Articles etc.)

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Report R 2004-8.pdf158KbAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


Feedback Chr. Michelsens Institutt
Fantoftveien 38, 5072 Bergen
E-post: bora@cmi.no